What role do (smart) assistance systems or smart home solutions play in this setting?
Koepp: Smart home, smart living, AAL (ambient assisted living) – everything works together. Home automation systems or a building that is directed toward the requirements and needs of its users and provides assistance – these aspects are obviously very important as part of our approach and certainly something that will become increasingly important in the future. Generally speaking, user acceptance is always crucial for the success of a product. The bottom line is, assistance systems or smart home solutions must successfully serve the users. You must meet their requirements and needs and avoid overwhelming them. If building plans and the respective technology ultimately serve people and prove helpful, then we fully embrace these solutions. We are also heavily involved in the development process. However – and it bears repeating – it must truly be user-centered or user-driven. This is not about adopting technology for technology’s sake, but about the human being, who must be at the center of attention.
How important is assistive technology as it pertains to self-determination and accessible living in your own home – both for the elderly and people with disabilities?
Koepp: It’s very important. That being said, market acceptance is, unfortunately, still low at the moment. Meanwhile, assistance systems can be important when it comes to reducing barriers and fostering independent living.
What obstacles and challenges do you see?
Koepp: Needless to say, there are heightened privacy concerns. Many users are afraid of what might happen with their data and are thus unwilling to consider smart home solutions.
There are also some ethical concerns, especially if you think of assistance systems for people with dementia. These systems emphasize observation, monitoring and are tracking devices. This is yet another area where we as a society and business leaders must decide how we want to effectively deal with these kinds of ethical dilemmas. While users have a sense of how this benefits them, they are also concerned about data protection and have possible ethical concerns. Customers have not yet fully accepted these concepts. Right now, this still puts a damper on the economic success of these types of systems in the marketplace.
What do you think needs to change?
Koepp: Ultimately, we all have to decide for ourselves. Family caregivers, who are very grateful for these types of systems are also involved in this scenario. They need to understand that this advantage goes along with some ethical concerns. These need to be considered and discussed with the affected person. Ideally, that person makes the ultimate decision on his/her own.
In other words, the ethical debate has to be solved at the user level.
As far as data protection is concerned, there needs to be a common communication platform for manufacturers that also has the support of policy-makers and maybe a seal of approval that guarantees that data is not transferred to a third-party.